The funeral oration of Pericles of 431 BC. J.-C., recorded in Thucydides` History of the Peloponnesian War, contains a passage praising the equality among the free male citizens of Athenian democracy: Another curiosity about this family of words is that we don`t usually use a predictable word as equal. In this case, the French intermediate phase of word history is the explanation: in French, the qu of Latin was pronounced as k by a process known as lenition, but some sounds changed to g instead, giving French the word egalitarian to English. In fact, Equalitarian exists in English, suggested by people who are going back to Latin rather than French; It just didn`t take. In modern French, equality is also written with a g: equality. A more familiar use of equity, more associated with the ideas of “reasonable ratio” or “balance,” begins with a legal designation originally called redemption equity; Noah Webster, himself a lawyer, included this meaning in his 1828 dictionary: The words used with equality show that equal treatment is the most common context: the principle of uniformity of taxation is closely linked to the concept of equality, since similar elements are also imposed only if the method of valuation is identical or uniform. In many countries, politicians, businessmen and other powerful and wealthy people emerge unscathed from their crimes. If a politician in a country is not even questioned about his corrupt nature and people literally applaud him and re-elect him, there is obviously no legal equality in such a country. Gender is the word most often associated with justice, which is not associated with money, but it is also commonly associated with equality – these terms overlap in usage. In Canada, the statutory right guaranteed by section 15 of the Charter. Equality is a much debated term, but at least it means that people are entitled to equal treatment by the state with respect to basic goods and services. In Canadian law, “equality” is measured by the guarantee of freedom from discrimination, that is, being selected to receive adverse treatment based on personal characteristics such as sex or race.
Equality is also described as a formal guarantee of “similar” treatment, for example by being subject to the same laws as everyone else; and as an additional guarantee of “substantive equality”, which recognizes that “similar treatment” is not always sufficient to ensure equality. Both meanings have been confirmed in Canadian law. Among the many principles that form the basis of the law is the principle of legal equality. As the name suggests, it is the principle that every person be treated equally before the law, or in other words, demands equal protection of the law for all, regardless of race, sex, religion or any other determining characteristic. The extent to which this principle is observed in legal systems around the world varies considerably. Long-standing cultural traditions have prevented equality in some countries, while intolerance has prevented equality in others. This is another of many seemingly redundant pairs in the constitutional rhetoric common in the legal language of the time, including “rules and regulations,” “wages and emoluments,” and “crimes and misdemeanors.” This usage has led to our modern meanings of “the value of land after deduction of any outstanding debt” (including the basis of a home equity loan) as well as the meaning of “a share in a company” or “a share of the shares of the company”. In fact, the term equities in finance is essentially synonymous with stocks.
In 1988, before becoming a Supreme Court justice, Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote: “Generalizations about what women or men are—my life experience corroborates—cannot reliably guide me in making decisions about particular individuals. At least in the law, I did not find any natural superiority or impairment in either sex. In teaching or classifying documents from 1963 to 1980, and now reading pleadings and hearing arguments in court for over seventeen years, I have not discovered any reliable indicators or clearly masculine or certainly feminine thinking – not even calligraphy. [18] In a project on women`s rights by the American Civil Liberties Union in the 1970s, Ginsburg in Frontiero v. Richardson called for laws that would provide health care to soldiers` wives, but not to the husbands of female soldiers. [19] There are currently more than 150 national constitutions mentioning gender equality. [20] I think a good way to see if there is legal equality in a nation is to see if the rich and powerful are held legally responsible for their actions, just like the rest of the social classes. The concept of legal equality is a central concept of classical liberalism. Classical liberalism is a philosophy developed throughout Western Europe and America in the 19th century.
Comments are closed.