After all, the key to great company-wide service delivery is to share your successes. This goes beyond sharing success internally. Of course, it is important that initiatives to provide services that have a positive financial impact on the business are fully celebrated. But companies should also get into the habit of sharing success with customers. It may go unnoticed that you are constantly delivering things as they were promised to customers. Or even taken for granted. Use case reports to regularly inform clients about how you act as legal counsel. In the long run, this will make you a more valuable partner. In this article, we will look at the provision of legal services. The objectives discussed here are a description of the provision of legal services, related off-the-shelf applications, and some of the practice areas. We will also review some use cases for an end user, a fulfiller, and a manager. Finally, we will talk about the important features of the app. Law firms that offer consumers little comparative value and win contracts disproportionately because of their reputation avoid risk.
In fact, client risk management and client stress reduction are arguably the most important services offered by law firms. While there has been a lot of discussion about applying lean start-up business practices to law firms, the two companies differ in at least one compelling way. A startup can tolerate significant unsuccessful service attempts, as long as it gets at least one good attempt. A company that launches 10 failed products but then launches an indispensable 11th can be a unicorn with a valuation of a billion dollars. Conversely, a law firm that loses 10 notable cases while achieving a remarkable 11th place should not hope to be liquidated and closed. Even well-managed innovation projects have a high probability of failure,14 and the probability of high-profile failures is a failure when it comes to convincing a company to launch such a project. For out-of-the-box applications associated with the provision of legal services, we have legal request management, case management, conflict of interest, digital forensics, simple contracts, warehouse pre-approval, advice center, agent virtual conversations, and mobile app. There is an asterisk next to legal claims management that only indicates that legal claims management is at the heart of all underlying applications.
You will need to have it installed to go elsewhere with the rest of the applications in Legal Service Delivery. It is important to note that the 2008 recession also introduced new ways of working for in-house legal departments. In 2020, Altman Weil reported that nearly 7 out of 10 law firms saw their clients transfer some of the work in-house. Most of the remaining companies see this coming. It is clear that those that are not sufficiently transparent or competitive compete not only with other companies, but also with the ability of customers to internalize costs. Much of this transformation has resulted in the growing popularity of legal service delivery. The natural heir to the combined thrones of legal project management, pricing, client services and a host of other legal service disciplines. At its core, legal service delivery is about delivering things as promised.
When implemented effectively, it enables companies to meet customer expectations, ensuring their ongoing collaboration. Given the time that has elapsed since 2008, it would be reasonable to assume that progress towards consistent service delivery would have been greater. Unfortunately, market research among law firms does not support this. While some companies are making a leap forward in measuring and improving their performance for their customers, they are still in the minority. Aside from the fact that companies don`t use service delivery at all, the most common problem is the inability to systematically adapt service delivery to impact everything in an organization. The idea is that the cost is too high or that it is too gigantic a task to do. It is important to note that not implementing good service delivery across the company is a missed opportunity. Sure, some of your business now runs on time and within budget, but the other half doesn`t. So your business isn`t as profitable as it could be. In addition to credibility and respect, the innovation group must also break down silos between information (about the project, the practice, the client or the lawyers) in order to be able to use the firm`s “volunteer army”. This degradation is mainly achieved by two types of regular sessions. One of these is a 15-minute “Scrum-style”18 meeting that is led by LSA and goes beyond project status to include competing priorities that team members are working on.
This meeting serves several important functions. He keeps the team informed of all project challenges. It provides insight into the potentially unrelated tasks and challenges of all team members, and offers opportunities for support and missed connections. And it usually familiarizes team members with each other. Although a project only lasts a few months, these months dedicated to a common goal mean that members are much more likely to grow closer in the future. Don`t miss this moment. The provision of legal services during the pandemic has permanently changed clients` expectations for access to the legal information and services they need. Many customers use their devices as their primary means of accessing daily services – from ordering dinner to paying their bills. Now, legal services are included in this mix, and pandemic-related office closures have exposed even more clients to the convenience of accessing legal information and services on the go. In the post-pandemic world, law firms have learned lessons about client service delivery, and clients no longer want to become what they used to be. Legal operations teams tasked with streamlining the delivery of legal services recognize that unstructured and ad hoc interactions between employees and the legal department slow things down. Instead of an organized process, teams process emails, phone calls, and spreadsheets to get their work done.
Instead of employees being able to serve themselves and find answers to basic questions, legal teams are forced to spend time responding to basic requests that ultimately cut back on their time on more complex issues. However, businesses are evolving faster than ever, whether due to their digital transformation or in response to macroeconomic trends and crises. They want to shorten sales cycles, bring new products to market faster, hire talent faster, create new channels and partnerships, and much more – all of which require legal advice. Legal operations feel this pressure to deliver services faster and reduce risk without being perceived as a bottleneck for the business. #PietervanderHoeven #legal #servicedelivery #lawfirms lawyers in law firms are specialized, and each of these specialists is a potential source of better service delivery to their clients. Since the DWT De Novo team is only a small department (outnumbered by a group of energetic partner sponsors), it employs generalists. Helping a partner research and shape a new idea in a way that ensures prudence and pragmatism requires skills that are not yet common in most law firms. To fill these gaps, DWT De Novo hired the role of Legal Solutions Architect (LSA).16 The platform also makes it easier for company members to collaborate with their colleagues. Work becomes lighter and teams more productive and efficient. The result is a high level of legal services provided at a speed that satisfies clients who no longer have the patience to wait. Over the past decade, LPM`s structured approach to “case management” has been proven to increase efficiency and reduce costs for lawyers and staff to deliver excellent legal work. In tenders and guidelines for external lawyers, clients often need legal project management skills.
But as traditional LPMs become more and more adopted, they lose their power to drive customers away from competing companies. Because they are largely fungible, law firms can claim very few competitive differentiators, namely legal work and service delivery.2 The traditional “case management” GPL provides tools to ensure that legal work remains excellent, but lacks tools to ensure that service delivery meets clients` needs in a way that at least satisfies and, Ideally, Ravit.3 Without being able to innovate in today`s service delivery, law firms are less able to achieve what should be the second dual goal of any professional services firm: to delight the client (see Figure 1 overleaf). As Jessica Davis, director of material performance and service innovation at McCarter & English, notes, this gap is a failure of service delivery. At McCarter, Jessica was able to use service delivery data to have conversations with clients before costs exceeded price agreements or before work piled up out of reach. This, in turn, reduced depreciation for the company by involving the customer in the decision-making process. Given lawyers` preference to be more self-reliant, skeptical, urgent, and less extroverted and resilient than average, a law firm`s innovation group should build its staff to compensate for these traits, while sharing enough of them to encourage fluid interaction.
Comments are closed.