However, it is not considered by the government as an optimal protection against the spread of the coronavirus. Contacted by HuffPost, the Directorate General of Health (DGS) believes that “the visor does not replace the mask” and specifies that “the decree making the wearing of masks mandatory only applies to masks” and not to visors. Anyone who uses a visor or the general public as an alternative to the surgical mask will therefore be punished with a fine of 135 euros. The decree does not apply to businesses that are not open to the public, which “must settle the issue of wearing masks on a case-by-case basis,” according to Prime Minister Jean Castex. In the absence of a rule in this private setting, no fine can be imposed for wearing a visor or mask. OBLIGATION TO WEAR A MASK – From now on, you will not only be chased out of the store. The wearing of masks was banned on Monday 20. July, mandatory in enclosed public places throughout the France, under penalty of a fine of 135 euros for offenses. This measure, whose objective is to stop the signs of a slight resurgence of Covid-19, reinforces a habit already well integrated by a majority of French people. The same goes for SNCF.
The carrier told HuffPost that only masks are accepted on trains and face shields cannot be considered an alternative to this requirement. Passengers who wear a visor without a mask will therefore be subject to a fine. If the mask is now considered by the government as an effective way to fight the coronavirus, the protective visor has not proven itself. The INSPQ notes that wearing a mask in certain situations can pose risks to the safety of workers, in particular by creating©©© mist©in the glasses. Wearing a visor is recommended© if the problem cannot be solved©by better ventilation or better working© hours. The MSSS states© that in the medical© world, the visor is only used to protect©health care workers when a harsh procedure©can cause©blood, body fluids, discretions or excretions©© […] which is never the case in© stores or©other public places. The visor is almost always worn© in conjunction with the mask. The France is not the first to distinguish the visor from the protective mask. In Switzerland, the Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH) advised against wearing the visor once on July 15 after a series of infections of staff with this protection in a hotel in Graubünden, reports La Tribune de Genève. In Quebec, people who wear only one visor are now “denied access to public transit and businesses” because this protection does not provide “any waterproofing,” according to the Ministry of Health and Welfare, quoted by Radio-Canada. However, several infection specialists interviewed by the New York Times at the end of June defend the use of the visor, highlighting its many qualities: it is infinitely reusable if cleaned properly, it protects the entire face and prevents the wearer from touching the face, it allows the preservation of facial expression, an essential characteristic for deaf and hard of hearing people, And it is almost impossible to wear it poorly (unlike masks, which are sometimes placed under the nose or mishandled after use).
She wants masks to become mandatory in schools and indoor public spaces. In France, the DGS took up the case on 7 March. He was urged to refer the matter to the High Council of Public Health (HCSP). In its opinion, prepared “on the basis of available scientific and technical data”, the HCSP recommends “not using visors as a substitute for masks for the general public” and “considering their use only in addition to wearing a mask”. Some workers may therefore need to review their (new) habits. Shopkeepers or catering staff, sometimes exposed to sustained speeds, have so far been able to take over from the visor for more comfort. They must now wear a mask, as required by the decree, which imposes the wearing of this protection in all “shops and shopping centers” as well as in “restaurants and pubs”, both for “the staff of the establishments” and for “people aged eleven years or older when moving inside the establishment”. The same conclusion applies to health care professionals who are exposed to the public and who should wear only one visor in addition to the mask.
If the HCSP recognizes that the visors can protect “the facial area and the associated mucous membranes”, including the nose, they “do not constitute in any way a filtration service” and “can not replace a respirator”, according to this statement, the latest published by the HCSP on the subject. Several organizations have called for the return of masks in indoor public spaces. In transport, where it was already mandatory, in shops or administrations, the mask has been part of the landscape since March. But another protection against the coronavirus has also been adopted by some: the protective visor. Fixed at the top of the forehead, covering the entire face, it sometimes represents a more comfortable alternative to the mask, which can interfere with breathing, for example, during physical exertion. The HCSP cites a 2014 study using a cough simulator that concludes that visors reduce the wearer`s viral exposure by 96% when they are 45 centimeters away from someone coughing, as you can see in the video below. But the visor is “less effective against small droplets that can diffuse from open sides,” notes the HCSP. The people surrounding the wearer of the visor are also not protected “from particles that remain in suspension,” says the National Institute for Research and Security (INRS), while the mask filters the virus.
Universities in the federal capital strongly recommend the use of masks indoors. The INSPQ and the MSSS remind that the best way to protect oneself from the new coronavirus is to keep a distance of ©two meters between people. Customers who wear only one visor will be denied access to stores. HOP`SAFE PLUS Global with collar PP SMS + membrane PE – Elastic – 65 g / m² – PSA Cat III Type 5B / 6B Schools and nurseries are not concerned by this measure, said the Minister of Health. Droplets projected©by the person wearing a visor can easily spread© through the air through the boxes©or the underside of the visor. A person with COVID-19 wearing only one visor is therefore likely to infect those around them. Op-Air One Medical Mask, Bandage + Splashproof EN 14683 Type IIR, Made of France, with anti-glare + foam + visor These pain and fever medications are rare due to respiratory virus outbreaks. While perceived by some people as more comfortable, wearing a face shield will not replace wearing a face covering in indoor public©spaces when it becomes mandatory on July 18. Between drug shortages, the return of the flu season and COVID-19, the situation worries pediatricians and specialists.
A remark all the more important as “uncertainties” about the transmission of the coronavirus remain in the air. The question “was the subject of a letter to the WHO signed on July 6 by 239 scientists from 32 countries who shared their observations on the frequency of contamination and clusters in closed environments, especially in case of air circulation and even without direct projection,” says the DGS. One union fears the failure could exacerbate the shortage of nurses in the health care system. The recommendations of the Institut national de santã publique du Québec©© (INSPQ) for workers are somewhat different from what the MSSS will impose on the population. The wearing of the visiãre alone is allowed, but only as a last resort. The response©of the Ministère de la Santé© et des Affaires sociaux (MSSS) is beyond©doubt. Citizens who wear only the visor are denied access to public transport and shops because they do not provide access©©©. Staff-Legal© – 2014 / web desarrollada por EmprendeLaw In addition, the Minister of Health© and Social Affairs, Christian Dubã©, made this©decision© in an interview on Monday. Since the beginning of the year, there have been frequent temporary interruptions of activity.
Public health recommends that patients stay home, which is difficult for some workers. “Keep in mind that effectiveness depends not only on the inherent properties of the protection, but also on how it is worn,” says Dr. S.
Comments are closed.