The enzyme substrate binding lock key model postulates that proximity also allows for biological reaction. Therefore, the subsequent dissociation of the enzyme-substrate complex leads to the enzyme and products. In addition, the lock-key model does not require a separate catalytic group for the action of the enzyme. In addition, the statically active center of the enzyme consists of a single unit in the locking key model. In short, the induced adaptation model is a model for enzyme-substrate interactions where the substrate does not fully integrate into the active center of the enzyme. Therefore, the active site of the enzyme must undergo a conformational change when binding to the substrate. In comparison, the lock-and-key model is a second enzyme-substrate interaction model, in which the substrate fully integrates into the enzyme`s active site. Therefore, it describes the specificity of binding the active site of the enzyme to a particular substrate. Therefore, the main difference between the induced fit and the lock and key pattern is the substrate binding mechanism and importance. The induced fit and lock model and the key model are the two models of enzyme-substrate interactions. In general, they describe how enzymes interact with the substrate.
The induced fit model refers to an enzyme-substrate interaction model in which the active center of the enzyme does not completely match the substrate. On the other hand, the lock-key model refers to a second enzyme-substrate interaction model, where the active center of the enzyme completely adapts to the substrate. Not all experimental evidence can be adequately explained by the so-called rigid enzyme model assumed by the lock key theory. For this reason, a modification called the induced adjustment theory has been proposed. The induced adaptation model explains the binding to the enzyme substrate better than the lock-key model. The induced fit model explains which of the following, i.e. not explained by the locking key model, the catalytic group weakens the substrate bonds either by nucleophilic or electrophilic attack in the induced fit model, while the catalytic group does not weaken the substrate bonds in the lock-key model. The lock-key model indicates that the active center of an enzyme adapts exactly to a particular substrate.
The induced adaptation model states that when an enzyme binds, the active center of an enzyme undergoes a conformational change to improve fit. The induced adaptation model takes into account the high specificity of enzymes, since the active site is not rigid, but can undergo a conformational change to better adapt to substrate binding. In the induced fit model, the active site of the enzyme must undergo a conformational change to improve binding, while the locking key model describes the specificity of the enzyme`s active site for a particular substrate. A theory to explain the mechanism of enzymatic reactions, in which it is proposed that the enzyme and substrate temporarily bind to form an enzyme-substrate complex. The binding site on the enzyme is called the active site and is structurally complementary to the substrate(s). Thus, the enzyme and substrate must fit together, as well as a lock and key. Search: `Lock and Key Theory` in Oxford Reference » The induced fit model was proposed by Daniel Koshland in 1958, while the locking key model was proposed by Emil Fischer in 1894. The lock-key model theory, first postulated by Emil Fischer in 1894, shows the high specificity of enzymes. However, this does not explain the stabilization of the transition state reached by enzymes.
From: Lock and Key Theory in a Zoological Dictionary » The main difference between the induced fit and the lock and key model is that in the induced fit model, the active center of the enzyme does not completely match the substrate, whereas in the lock and key model, The active center of the enzyme is the complement of the substrate and therefore adapts exactly to the substrate. In addition, in the induced adaptation model, the active site of the enzyme must undergo a conformational change to improve binding, while the lock-key model describes the specificity of the enzyme`s active site for a particular substrate. The active center of the enzyme does not completely match the substrate in the induced fit model, while the active center of the enzyme exactly matches the substrate in the locking key model. The specific effect of an enzyme with a single substrate can be explained using a locking and key analogy first postulated by Emil Fischer in 1894. In this analogy, the lock is the enzyme and the key is the substrate. Only the key of correct size (substrate) fits into the keyhole (active site) of the lock (enzyme). In the lock-and-key model, the enzyme-substrate interaction indicates that the enzyme and substrate have specific complementary geometric shapes that fit exactly into each other. Like a key in a lock, only the right size and shape of the substrate (the key) would fit in the active center (keyhole) of the enzyme (the lock). The induced adaptation model proposed by Daniel Koshland in 1958 suggests that the active site continues to change until the substrate is completely bound to the active site of the enzyme, after which the final shape and charge are determined. Unlike the lock and key model, the induced fit model shows that enzymes tend to be flexible structures.
A transition state develops before the reactants undergo changes in the induced fit model, while a transition state does not develop until the reactants undergo changes in the lock and key model. The locking mechanism is a metaphor to explain the specificity of the active site of the enzyme and substrate. Thus, only certain keys fit into a lock, only certain substrates in the active center of an enzyme. The substrate is specific to a particular active site. When the right substrate binds to the active site of the enzyme, an enzyme substrate complex is formed. The enzyme catalyzes a reaction, an enzyme product complex is formed, and the product is released. The enzyme can then be used again and again to catalyze other reactions. There is a distinct catalytic group in the enzyme in the induced adaptation model, whereas in the locking key model, there is no distinct catalytic group in the enzyme. The lock-key model is the second model that describes the enzyme-substrate interaction.
However, Emil Fischer proposed this model in 1894. Therefore, it is also called Fisher`s theory. According to the key-lock model, the active center of the enzymes serves as a “lock”, while its substrate serves as a “key”. For this reason, the shape of the active center of the enzyme is complementary to the shape of the substrate. This allows the active center of the enzyme to keep the substrate closer to the enzyme by forming an unnecessary intermediate compound, which is the enzyme-substrate complex. The active site is the binding site for the catalytic reaction and inhibition of the enzyme and substrate; The structure of the active site and its chemical properties are specific for substrate and enzyme bonding. Three models of enzyme-substrate binding are the lock-and-key model, the induced adaptation model, and the transition state model. The lock-and-key model assumes that the active site of the enzyme is well suited to the substrate that does not require changes in enzyme structure after the enzyme has bound the substrate.
Comments are closed.