Hello. This example is a format for taking an actual position of what I submitted to Dole for work-related cases. You do not need to create the same position paper. It depends on the topic/problem you are going to be working on. You just need to understand the concept of what a position paper is, i.e. to have a contentious issue and, of course, your arguments on the page you`re on for it. What matters are your arguments. Make it strong by providing a compelling foundation to prove your point. Make sure that what you provide as an argument has a legal basis in case of legal problems. In this section, you will deal with the problems of the case. Here, you will argue on your side by citing your logic, your legal bases and your explanations.
You will answer questions in favour of your client or if you represent yourself, you will have to argue in your favour by justifying your complaint with legal bases such as case law and case law decisions or legal provisions. You must also attach your evidence to your arguments. Consider the following example of the non-existence of an employer-employee relationship: The objective of this document is to strengthen the legal framework for child protection so that no child in the Philippines is vulnerable to sexual exploitation and abuse. The analysis and recommendations reflect the real challenges faced by dozens of professionals moving within the Philippines` robust child protection legal framework, as well as recommendations from a diverse group of stakeholders supporting the child protection agenda. The document lists several obstacles faced by law enforcement, regulators, policymakers, private industry, civil society and others to promote effective action to combat this crime. Through practical recommendations, we strive to clarify the applicable legal statuses that collectively hinder or challenge the operational actions of different stakeholders. We respectfully urge policymakers in the Philippine Congress to address the cause and support the review, revision and/or drafting of new laws that address the challenges identified to address the remaining gaps that make our children vulnerable. In addition, the bill extends the composition of the Anti-Terrorism Council (ATC) to other heads of executive departments (Article 45, SB 1083 and HB 6875). However, all members must continue to be alter egos or appointees of a sitting chair.
The ATC has also been empowered to designate individuals or entities as terrorists in addition to those already designated by the United Nations Security Council for monitoring and investigation by the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC). Apart from probable cause, TAC has no established criteria for naming. This may be subject to arbitrary interpretation and application, particularly without the involvement of governmental bodies independent of the executive, such as the Commission on Human Rights (CHR) (Article 25, SB 1083 and HB 6875). On February 26, 2020, the Senate passed Bill 1083 or the Anti-terrorism Act at third and final reading. On June 1, 2020, President Rodrigo Duterte confirmed that the law was urgent. Two days later, despite opposition from various groups, the House of Representatives approved his version, House Bill No. 6875. The purpose of the bill is to amend and repeal Republic Act No.
9372 or the Human Security Act of 2007 (HSA), which, although subject to criticism from human rights groups for possible abuses by law enforcement and abuse or usurpation of the term human security at the time of its passage, were also not desirable by them. who had to apply it because of the safeguards against abuse. On the contrary, the Anti-Terrorism Act removes the safeguards present in the SAH and reduces penalties for abuse of power by the authorities concerned. Have a nice day. I have a question about position papers. Our professor of legal research and bibliography told us to prepare a position paper. Our teacher used your blog as an example. Does that mean we have to present the same position paper as yours? Your case is considered a sham, isn`t it? Thank you in advance for your reply. In accordance with Covid-19 Notice No. 05 of March 17, 2020, mandatory arbitration conferences for claims submitted to the Regional Arbitration Board during the quarantine period have been abolished and, therefore, the Honourable Labour Arbitrator has requested the parties to submit their respective position papers within (15) calendar days of receipt of the order.
The defendant MANLOLO CO., INC. (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Company”) is a corporation duly incorporated and existing under the laws of the Philippines with a business address at ___ (Note: The defendant company is represented by its officer, whose name is necessarily included in the complaint. Thus, in this section, you can also indicate the name of the representative of the company and his address, as well as his position vis-à-vis the company. They must attach in the notes proof that he is the representative of the company. For example, you can specify: “The respondent company is represented by its Secretary General MARIA JOSE, Filipino, major in law, whose address is ___. A copy of their certificate of employment is attached as Appendix “1.”) Me, ____ HSA). The accused also has the right to be informed of the end of surveillance, interception and recording if no proceedings are initiated against him for violation of the law (Article 10 of the SAH). However, under the proposed measure, these parts have been deleted. Hello, can you provide a template of the notice in which the NLRC requests from the respondent and appellant the position papers represented by the respondent/appellant representing himself (or through legal counsel) and very respectfully presenting this position paper to this honourable office and stating that: (Note: In cases prior to NLRC, the appearance of non-lawyers is allowed, if the non-lawyer presents himself as a party to the case) Thank you very much for that. It is easier for me to understand what a verified position paper is after seeing this than to read its definition. Under the proposed legislation, the Anti-Money Laundering Board (AMLC) no longer needs a court order to conduct investigations (Section 35, SB 1083 and HB 6875).
This can lead to an AMLC fact-finding tour under the leadership of TAC of political enemies, critics and vehement opposition to any government. Complainant DORA REKLAMADORA (hereinafter referred to as the “Complainant”) is an adult Filipino for informational purposes with the address ____ Hello, this is actually a position paper submitted by the parties after the receipt of the complaint by the NLRC. You can first file a complaint with the NLRC using other forms.
Comments are closed.