A securityholder who holds at least $1,000 or one per cent of the securities of a corporation may submit a proposal for action through the proxy circular. As soon as a shareholder is notified in a timely manner to the Company, a statement is attached to the proxy circular. Security holders have the opportunity to vote on the proposal on the proxy form. The scheme is unpopular with management, but shareholders have used this provision to change or challenge management remuneration, the conduct of general meetings, shareholder voting rights and issues related to discrimination and pollution in the company`s operations. Many of the treaties listed in Part II contain chapters on the Law of the Blue Sky. In addition, the following sources discuss state securities laws and regulations in more detail. The study guides concisely describe the basic principles of securities law. Study guides to the law library`s collection that have been updated since the passage of the Dodd-Frank Act include Larry D. Soderquist & Theresa A.
Gabaldon, Securities Law, 5th ed. (Reserves KF 1440. S64 2014) and Marc I. Steinberg, Understanding Securities Law, 7th ed. (Reserves KF1440. S74 2018). Due to the complexity of securities law, it may be helpful for researchers to start with some of the many secondary sources available. Secondary sources include dictionaries and glossaries, introductory articles, articles, scientific journals, newsletters, websites, and blogs. (A) the name, legal form, address and address of the issuer`s website; Securities are traded on the markets.
Some, but not all, markets have a physical location. The essence of a securities market lies in its formal or informal communication systems, in which buyers and sellers make their interests known and carry out transactions. These trading markets are vulnerable to manipulative and deceptive practices such as price manipulation or “insider trading”, i.e. gaining an advantage based on non-public information. To prevent such fraudulent practices, all securities laws contain general anti-fraud provisions. Several New Deal-era securities laws passed in response to the 1929 stock market crash established the legal framework for the Federal Securities Act, which (as amended) still applies today. Researchers will therefore find that secondary sources and collections of primary sources are often organized according to the act to which they relate. As noted in numerous documents, these important federal securities laws include the following: (K) To the extent that the seller is a person who exercises control over the issuer, a brief statement of the nature of the affiliation and a statement confirmed by that seller that the seller has no reasonable reason to believe that the issuer is in violation of securities laws or regulations.
The U.S. Supreme Court recently clarified section 10(b) in two cases. In 2007, Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, LTD (06-484) determined the specificity required to claim fraud. Because Congress required sufficient facts from which “a strong conclusion could be drawn that the defendant acted with the requisite mindset,” the Supreme Court ruled that a “strong conclusion” means showing “conclusive and convincing evidence.” During the 2007-2008 legislature, the Supreme Court ruled that paragraph 10(b) does not provide non-state plaintiffs, explicitly or implicitly, with a private cause of action against aides and instigators in securities fraud cases.
Comments are closed.