Mental health battles exacerbated by the depths of the pandemic appear to have subsided, resulting in similar and still worrying anxiety and depression that has plagued the legal industry for several years, according to annual results from the mental health survey by Law.com and ALM Intelligence. Portals are always promising for users and courts. These assessments show that portals developed for the needs of users can successfully provide the necessary legal information and allow people to solve their legal problems. While applying the results of the evaluation and lessons learned, LSC continues to support new projects, expand the scope of existing portals, and facilitate knowledge sharing. These examples should demonstrate the power of “although”. There are many other subordinate conjunctions that a short author can use – including “legal” ties such as “whatever” that attract some lawyers – but in my opinion, none is more effective for the above purposes than “although”. Keep this in mind when writing your next letter. Just be careful not to abuse it. On April 18, I published an article on the use of the word “but” to contrast sharply with a point mentioned earlier. I referred to “but” as a “word of power,” which is the name I use for words in the legal literature that convey certain meanings better than similar words.
The word of power I`m going to discuss in this article is “however.” And while Hurd has primarily focused on cannabis` best-known psychoactive compound — THC — and to a lesser extent CBD, she pointed out that their interaction with the human brain is complicated by another factor: the body`s natural cannabinoids. In both examples, “although” was used in the context of a sentence to mitigate the effects of adverse events. In this following example, the same approach was used to mitigate the effect of facts favorable to the counterparty. Defending an owner in a personal injury, slip-up, and falls case from a few years ago, I wrote: In his excellent book on how big appeal lawyers use when drafting their pleadings, Ross Guberman discusses the use of “al-that” to reduce the impact of adverse facts. It provides the following example of how Ted Olson dealt with adverse facts in the victorious letter he filed in the infamous Citizens United case before the U.S. Supreme Court by placing the facts in context. A few years ago, I used a similar approach — with the subordinate conjunction “although” — when I began a key sentence in a letter I wrote for two former University of Alabama assistant football coaches in their defamation case against the NCAA, where the crucial question was whether or not they should be classified as plaintiffs of public figures. I had to downplay their high profile in a state where college football fans practically love such coaches: To better understand what works and give more people the opportunity to get legal information, The Pew Charitable Trusts partnered with Legal Services Corporation (LSC) – the largest funder of civil legal aid – to support the development of the Legal Navigator platform. An interactive portal that provides information and helps users develop action plans on their legal issue. To improve how these portals help users, Pew also worked with Stanford University`s Legal Design Lab to make portals easier to find, and with Auburn University`s Center for Evaluation to test how well these portals meet the needs of those seeking legal information online. Returning to the legal implications of this science, Hurd said: “If we want to stop women for smoking cannabis, we should stop most of society for the stress it causes in pregnant women. Hurd holds the Ward Coleman Chair in Translational Neuroscience and is Director of the Institute of Addiction at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.
She was quick to address the legal history of cannabis in this country and pointed to the huge racial differences in arrests, convictions and other punishments, such as the separation of mothers from their newborns after positive drug tests. Access to accurate legal information can help civil court users make informed decisions about their cases and improve court efficiency because litigants are better informed and prepared. At the same time, those looking for advice online often find a mix of resources that are not all user-friendly or easy to find. A recent CBS News/YouGov poll found that two-thirds of Americans want recreational marijuana use to be legal. Nearly 70% of states allow the medical use of cannabis products, and a growing number of them have legalized recreational use. The Auburn rating focused on the Legal Navigator websites in Hawaii and Alaska, Minnesota`s LawHelpMN, and Ohio Legal Help. The analysis showed that sample portals typically follow four key principles: they allow users to ask specific questions about their legal issues, refine their questions, learn, and then connect to relevant legal and non-legal resources. Yet accessible legal information, even if done right, is only part of the solution. To make the most of new technologies, policymakers need to challenge assumptions about how court users interact with these systems and systematically address stumbling blocks in court proceedings. Pew`s technology-related work around search engine optimization and court technology research during the pandemic has used such an approach. Casey Chiappetta is working on The Pew Charitable Trusts` project to modernize the civil justice system.
But while law enforcement`s biased use of marijuana has led to a trend toward legalization, the science is more unclear. Even beyond its “complex history” and “complex legal and political status,” cannabis is a “complex plant,” Hurd said. “Cannabis contains more than 500 chemicals, including more than 140 cannabinoids, which have more or less psychopharmacological activity.” Portals help people better understand their legal problems, but they can only go so far as to resolve the underlying power imbalances between those who have lawyers and those who don`t. Both the Auburn evaluation and the OASIS Summit highlighted the challenges caused by the lack of uniform court procedures and forms, as well as the challenges of court integration, for example in the context of e-filing. Courts and their support systems need to be redesigned to better serve unrepresented court users, with the empowerment of litigants at the heart of the changes. The data shows that the legal industry can master the realities of the pandemic and even benefit from things like remote work. But the historical triggers associated with law firm structures still have negative effects. The Legal Navigator project started in 2022, years after its scheduled date due to technology-related delays, contract changes and other challenges. Now, each state`s sites are up and running, and portal owners are working with LSC to further refine their sites and share with the field what they`ve learned about showcasing user-centric design that includes stakeholder feedback. LSC has also supported the development of several mutual legal assistance portals through its Technology Initiative Grant Program. “We know that portals will never be able to meet everyone`s legal needs,” said Glenn Rawdon, Senior Technology Advisor at LSC. “But by providing visitors with information and resources, portals allow them to find solutions that work for them if they can`t find a lawyer or can`t afford a lawyer.” License our cutting-edge legal content to develop your thought leadership and build your brand.
Evaluations have also shown that technology-driven projects do not succeed without examining the underlying processes and inequalities; cooperation with stakeholders in mutual legal assistance, social services, law libraries and courts; and provide support to users, regardless of how they engage. LawHelpMN and Ohio Legal Help have both developed robust content and focused on plain language, accessibility and providing information to the users from whom they access the portal, for example via the homepages of the respective portals or via Google. “Although”, a subordinate conjunction, indicates a contrast between two sentences of one sentence and adds a subordinate clause to the main clause. In doctrine, it is a word of power to turn to either to minimize a weakness in one`s client`s argument or to highlight a weakness in the opposing party`s argument. Since much of an appeal brief consists of these types of arguments, it is easy to understand how important an effective word is to convey such points. Although nearly 70% of states have legalized the medical use of cannabis products, some health professionals are taking a closer look at the effects on the brain. What we consume and when in life we are exposed to it plays an important role in how our brain can be affected. This was the message from Hurd, who spoke in the online presentation “Neuroscience and Cannabis: Implications for Law and Policy” – which rightly took place on 4/20, a nod to marijuana in cannabis cultivation. The one-hour presentation was part of the Project on Law and Applied Neuroscience, a collaboration between the Center for Law, Brain and Behavior at Massachusetts General Hospital and the Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics at Harvard Law School. As an indication, she repeated, “Your brain doesn`t fully mature until you`re in your mid-20s, so the longer you can wait to start eating, the better for brain health.” In addition, she said: “Look at the cannabis you consume – make sure it doesn`t contain high-dose THC and contains CBD.
Comments are closed.